On 5/16/05, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Too terse - I don't understand why you're asking this. But if you really
> think that we allow everything we don't ban, we should say that
> somewhere in the spec.

hmm. I could write that Pace if you want, but maybe it would be more
productive to explain why you find my interpretation "psychotic".
Maybe you could point to some spec text to back up your opinion. MarkN
seems to think its only this or other IETF working groups that can
extend the Atom namespace. I don't see anything in the spec about
that.

Robert Sayre

Reply via email to