Monday, May 16, 2005, 5:39:17 PM, Graham wrote:
> On 16 May 2005, at 5:16 pm, Eric Scheid wrote: >> if you want to sort by updated or published, but not for most recently >> changed (even if not 'significantly') > Well yes. So? I consider atom:modified to be unfeasible anyway for > all sorts of reasons, so we're not losing any capability here. Can you explain some? I don't see atom:version would be more feasible. atom:version doesn't support some cases that atom:modified does, and it doesn't really seem easier to explain in the spec or implement. Are you thinking of some scenarios where a publisher wouldn't be able to produce a modified date, but would be able to produce a version? - or do you mean it wouldn't be feasible for other non-technical reasons? -- Dave
