On 22/5/05 12:25 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ben Lund is okay with the current draft: >> http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg15380.html >> >> Why aren't you? > > Because what you presented to him makes no sense against the current > draft. > > [...] > > Which makes no sense. The two usages are incompatible, and the spec > needs to say which is correct.
what if <author> in that example was renamed to <byline> (and specced to be something other than a Person Construct), and some mechanism introduced to indicate the nature of the contribution by each of the <contributor>s? using that model (in that message) without renaming the <author> element will only be confusing. e.
