At 08:47 05/05/20, Eric Scheid wrote: > >On 19/5/05 10:41 PM, "Tim Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We suggest that there may be WG consensus in favor of changing the >> format spec to make atom:id a required child of atom:feed. (Text not >> provided, we trust the editors to figure out the correct way to say >> this). Please indicate agreement or disagreement with this proposition >> in the next day or two. > >wth, +1
+1 here too. Regards, Martin.
