On 24/5/05 9:56 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say it draws from atom:source OR atom:feed. >
You meant atom:source XOR atom:feed? > atom:feed should not be used if atom:source exists, even if it doesn't > contain an atom:author, which it SHOULD. > (well, it SHOULD, unless atom:entry already contains atom:author, right?) > (unrelated question: what's with this plus sign " & atomLink+" in the > atom:source production?) > well spotted. e.
