Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 7:50:13 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> David Powell wrote: >>Whether the draft allowed it or not, atom:link isn't an extension >>point. >> >> > Could you explain why? The following are extension points: * Adding additional metadata to atom:feed by using Section 6.4 Extension Elements. * Adding additional metadata to atom:entry by using Section 6.4 Extension Elements. * Adding additional metadata to Person Constructs by using Section 6.4 Extension Elements. * Adding new atom:link types by using new @rel attributes. * Embedding arbitrary data by using atom:content. Atom processors won't fail if you put elements in other places, but I didn't think that they were extension points. -- Dave
