* Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 20:10]:
> What about:
> 
>    The "atom:link" element defines a reference from an entry or
>    feed to a Web resource. Atom doesn't define any child to the
>    "atom:link", though it might contain extension markup.

I may be trying to pick a colour for the bikeshed, but is an
explicit mention of the possibility of extension elements really
necessary? Unnecessary redundancy is an invitation for
inconsistencies.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle

Reply via email to