Joe Gregorio wrote:
On 6/17/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:P.S. Why is this on atom-sytax? Is there a concrete proposal we are talking about here? Is there likely to be?Were you expecting [atom-syntax] to vanish in a puff of smoke once we have a couple RFCs under our belt? Given the technology,and the participants, I would expect [atom-syntax] to have the longevity of [xml-dev].
Silly me. And here I thought it fertile grounds for a protocol discussion. Carry on, then.
- Sam Ruby
