On 24/6/05 1:28 AM, "Tim Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In other words, this isn't bad news, just a delay. > > Fully disagree. The world has many implementors eagerly awaiting the > arrival of Atom so they can start using it. If there are problems > that require repair, I don't want to wait two more weeks to find out > about them. This is very disappointing. -Tim >
we can start with these two... <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id= 36536> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id= 36539> e.