+1
On 01/07/2005, at 8:36 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:44 PM +0900 7/1/05, Martin Duerst wrote:
At 10:26 05/07/01, Paul Hoffman wrote:
To be added near the end of Section 5.1 of atompub-format:
Section 6.5.1 of [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] requires
support
for Canonical XML. Atom Processors that sign Atom Documents MUST
> use Canonical XML.
The rest of your changes looked reasonable, but the MUST above
looks too strong to me.
Good catch. I think we can make the requirement for
canonicalization like we do for encryption and signing: put the
onus on the receiver. That would change the wording to:
Atom Processors that verify signed Atom Documents MUST
be able to canonicalize with Canonical XML.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
--
Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO BEA Systems
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
