* A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-13 08:11]: > Obviously, my own vote is that it’s fine as is: I see no reason > that dictates that atom:link must point to a concrete Web > resource, rather than just an abstract one – neither > conceptually/semantically nor in terms of consequences for > implementation of Atom generators and consumers.
I should clarify that I defer this to the particular relationship type. In an atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'alternate'], I do absolutely expect the @href to be dereferencable. What I don’t see any reason for is to mandate that @href must always be dereferencable, regardless of whether the semantics of the type in @rel would require that or not. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
