* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 23:15]: > Feedback requested.
I like it so far; comments follow (no pun intended). > /root provides the URL (dereferencable) to the Atom feed that > contains the original entries and may appear within atom:feed > and/or atom:entry Why is this restricted to being an Atom feed? Shouldn’t @type govern the precise meaning? Should linking to other kinds of resources, such as a weblog with the appropriate autodiscovery tags in its HTML or to a FOAF file, be outlawed? If not, are there any SHOULD/MUST requirements for linked resources? > /in-reply-to provides the atom:id (not dereferencable) of an > original atom:entry and may appear within atom:feed or > atom:entry. in-reply-to on the feed level indicates that all > of the entries within the feed are considered replies to the > identified atom:entry. Is it legal if it appears at both levels? And what does it mean then? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
