Le 05-08-25 à 18:51, Bob Wyman a écrit :
    At PubSub we *never* "crawl" to discover feed URLs. The only feeds
we know about are:
    1. Feeds that have announced their presence with a ping
    2. Feeds that have been announced to us via a FeedMesh message.
3. Feeds that have been manually submitted to us via our "add- feed"
page.
    We don't crawl.

- How one who has previously submitted a feed URL remove it from the index? (Change of opinions) - How someone who's not mastering the ping (built-in in the service, the software) but doesn't want his/her feed being indexed by the service.

I do not think we qualify as a "robot" in the sense that is relevant to robots.txt. It would appear that Walter Underwood of Verity would agree with me since he says in his recent post that: "I would call desktop clients "clients" not "robots". The distinction is how they add feeds to the polling list. Clients add them because of human decisions. Robots discover them mechanically and add them." If Walter is correct, then he must agree with me that robots.txt does not apply to PubSub! (and, we should not be on his
"bad" list.... Walter? Please take us off the list...)

It does apply, except if you give a possibility to each subscribers to ban a specific URIs.

I think it's one of the main issue of the Web, too many implicit contracts. That's good because it helps to make the things easier, but at the same time, it means creating the infrastructure to deny explicitly. I guess the Feed industry is not eager too much to do that, because implicit data mining is one big part of the business.

Basically imagine this scenario, when you go out every morning from your house, we take a photo of you and the way you are dress. It helps us to know how the people of this area are dressed then to create shops around. That will help us to send you appropriate catalogs of clothes you like, and to park a car with an ads with the products you usually like. Do you have the right to say "No, I don't want to take a photo of me every morning for that purpose"?

--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***



Reply via email to