On 25/10/05 1:12 PM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 to Eric's -1.  Let's keep it simple.
> 
> <link rel="..." type="..." href="...">
> <x:alternate type="..." href="..." title="..." />
> </link>

I'm also liking it from another angle...

With some of the other approaches dumb clients do harm to others, and while
smart clients do no harm they don't get anything which dumb clients already
get.

With this approach dumb clients do no harm, and smart clients gain benefits
not available to dumb clients. It sets up the right ecological pressures for
the market to evolve in a way which is beneficial.

So while "let the market/implementations decide" is often persuasive, we
really should at the same time be asking what environment/ecology are we
establishing for this evolution.

e.

Reply via email to