On 25/10/05 1:12 PM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to Eric's -1. Let's keep it simple. > > <link rel="..." type="..." href="..."> > <x:alternate type="..." href="..." title="..." /> > </link> I'm also liking it from another angle... With some of the other approaches dumb clients do harm to others, and while smart clients do no harm they don't get anything which dumb clients already get. With this approach dumb clients do no harm, and smart clients gain benefits not available to dumb clients. It sets up the right ecological pressures for the market to evolve in a way which is beneficial. So while "let the market/implementations decide" is often persuasive, we really should at the same time be asking what environment/ecology are we establishing for this evolution. e.