On 1/19/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The existing behaviour is based on the various incarnations of RSS where the > only document type involved are feeds. RFC 4287 introduces a new document > type, the Atom Entry Document, which autodiscovery-01 fails to take into > consideration. That doesn't meet my definition of "well-written".
Well, if anyone actually did that, it might be a problem. But, then again, it might not be. You've had years to propose your definition of "well-written". I think the current draft reflects what implementations do pretty well. We haven't been able to come to consensus on additional features, so I suggest we're done. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."