On 1/19/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That would *still* be considered an autodiscovery link to a "feed", > according the current autodiscovery spec. That's the problem right there.
It's not a "problem". It works now, and no one is going to run out and change the running code. If someone did do "alternate entry", I can see implementations getting patches to ignore those. In fact, you don't even need a spec to help. Just start doing it. If it becomes common, there will be patches. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
