On 1/19/06, Phil Ringnalda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, if we spec only things which include "feed" in the rel > value as being appropriate for aggregators, and all others as not, we > still would need to wait three or four years for existing use of > "alternate" alone to die down before any aggregator developer would > consider following along and ignoring non-"feed"s.
First person to need the feature has to spec "alternate entry" instead of making everyone change to "alternate feed". Not it! -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
