On 1/19/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PaceDifferentRelValue addresses this. It suggests using "feed" as an @rel > value to indicate the referenced resource is a feed (ie. is not an entry > doc) which can be subscribed to.
The spec already does this without a new rel value. > It doesn't rule out continuing to use > "alternate" for those cases where the feed is actually an alternate to the > current document. I am lie-down-in-the-road opposed to PaceDifferentRelValue. Interesting idea. I suggest someone write a DifferentSpec. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
