On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: > The spec is extremely > well-written [...].
Heartily concur. On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Tim Bray wrote: > +1. Ship it. -Tim +1. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:09 AM To: Robert Sayre Cc: Atom Syntax; Phil Ringnalda; Mark Pilgrim Subject: Re: finishing autodiscovery, like now On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: > > PaceAnchorSupport and PaceDifferentRelValue don't seem very useful, > and they weren't proposed by implementors. The spec is extremely > well-written and reflects existing behavior. > > Can we please un-expire this: > http://philringnalda.com/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.html > > and be done? +1. Ship it. -Tim > > -- > > Robert Sayre > > "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." >
