* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-04 18:00]: > The only sane answer would have been to make link extensible.
There’s no doubt about that at this point. Non-extensibility of links has caused us a lot of pain in several different extensions at this point. Unfortunately, only hindsight is 20/20… > However, for now, I think I'll proceed by simply dropping the > count and when from the draft. Okay. It’s a pity, since folks were obviously getting value from that information, but it’s an acceptable move. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
