* M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-04 23:30]: > Or is something like this simply inviting WAY TOO MANY little > things to find justification to plug up the collective inbox of > the community members?
I don’t know. So far during extension development discussions, only the missing extensibility for links has stuck out as a real sore point in RFC 4287. Other than that, the spec has stood up very well with only a few minor errata reported here and there. At least, that’s my impression; I don’t know what others think, of course. Frankly, I would hope there won’t be much interest – cause if there is, what else would that mean than that we did a shoddy job? :-) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
