Well, the subject says it all; here they are:
- It were nice if the example in 7.1 would include @xml:lang, since both
workspace/@title and collection/@title are Language-Sensitive.
Granted, there might be a Content-Language response header (not shown)
to do the job, but IMHO the example would benefit from making language
information explicit.
- The proposed file extension for APP Introspection Documents (.atomsrv)
and its media type (application/atomserv+xml) are inconsistent. It would
IMHO be better to use either "atomsrv" or "atomserv" consistently in
both file extension and media type. Everything else is just confusing
for no good reason.
Regards,
Andreas Sewe
FWIW, I have set the Reply-To to atom-protocol, since it seems to be the
more appropriate list to discuss these things -- not that it really
matters, given the overlap between atom-syntax's and atom-protocol's
audiences...
