Eric Scheid wrote:
On 30/6/06 1:34 AM, "Bill de hÓra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which are clients supposed to respect in a conflict, the
Content-Language header or the xml:lang, ie, does XML On The Web Failing
Miserably, Utterly, And Completely extend to Content-Language+xml:lang?
xml:lang, if you think of xml being nested.
in other words, what is the lang of the atom:content below:
HTTP 200 OK
Content-Language: ch
...
<feed xml:lang="fr" ...>
<entry xml:lang="it">
<content xml:lang="en" ...>
...
</content>
...
</entry>
...
</feed>
Hi Eric,
I guess my next question is - do we need to tell people this in the
protocol spec, or should I Just Know That, Utterly, And Completely ?
cheers
Bill