* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 17:40]: > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceEntryMediatype
+1 * Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 20:35]: > I'd largely prefer augmenting the existing media type with > a 'type' parameter: > - application/atom+xml => either feed or entry (as defined in RFC4287) > - application/atom+xml;type=feed => feed > - application/atom+xml;type=entry => entry -0 > How about defining a "tree" similar to the */vnd.* one? > - application/atom+xml => feed or entry document > - application/atom.categories+xml => category document > - application/atom.service+xml => service document > ...and of course, if this proposal is finally accepted: > - application/atom.entry+xml => entry document +1 I like this very much; it would put some order in the proliferation of Atom-related MIME types. > As for Tim's concerns, I'd also prefer having it done outside > the APP. +0 > Also, the APP draft would need to be updated to remove the > "entry" special value for app:accept, as it would be equivalent > to the new or revised media type > (app:accept=application/atom+xml;type=entry or > app:accept=applicationAtom.entry+xml) +1 Unification is good. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
