On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:22:24 +0100, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It wasn't the most illustrative choice of words, but what I'm looking for is evidence that an entry is interpreted differently if it's found in an entry document, than if it were found in a feed document. If we turn up multiple interoperable examples of that, then a new media type is warranted because it's really two formats masquerading as one.
To turn it a bit around: Would you ever want to subscribe to a single Atom Entry? If not, wouldn't it be good to know that it was an Atom Entry and not an Atom Feed before you started subscribing to it?
-- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
