On Jan 5, 2007, at 09:47, Martin Duerst wrote:
So I think that Atom is a bit out on it's egde if it says 'if you don't have a +xml Mime Type, you're not XML'.
No, Atom says that if you don't use application/xml or an +xml type, you don't get to use an embedded subtree and your format gets the kind of treatment that non-XML formats get.
Atom is quite reasonable here. An XML vocabulary that doesn't have a MIME type that follows the convention *and* doesn't have a namespace is itself a badly-behaved XML vocabulary.
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
