Around about 27/11/07 11:49, Axel Thimm typed ... > BTW thin kabout moving to RHEL5/CentOS5 if you are on FC5. It means > that you don't upgrade that often (FC5->F8 is 1.5 years), and that > cycle is the same as RHEL's so you might be better off following > RHEL's/CentOS' cycle then.
Hmm, hadn't considered that ... Would I get away with using a CentOS 'upgrade' on top of an FC5, do you think? I don't *really* want to faff around re-installing my Myth settings [yet], as there's usually already enough of a downtime just tidying up the upgrade. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rm -f .signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l .signature ls: .signature: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
