Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > I attach a tentative patch to make AUCTeX major mode names not overwrap > built-in TeX modes. In this patch, the new mode names (value of > `major-mode') are > - plain-TeX-mode > - LaTeX-mode > - docTeX-mode > - Texinfo-mode > - ConTeXt-mode > - AmSTeX-mode > (There are additional renamed modes > + japanese-plain-TeX-mode > + japanese-LaTeX-mode > + ConTeXt-en-mode > + ConTeXt-nl-mode > but they don't have their own `major-mode' value. > The name and role of `TeX-tex-mode' doesn't change.)
Thanks for working on this, Keita. I have to re-read the thread, but wasn't a point also that latex-mode and LaTeX-mode are also confusing to some users? If so, can we think about coming up with mode names instead of camel-case'ing the built-in ones? > I think that its core functionality works as > expected. If you are interested in this feature, please give it a try. > > 1. I'd like to push it to savannah server as a feature branch of AUCTeX > repository (it isn't ready to merge into master branch yet.) Do you > think it's OK? Yes, please do so. > If so, I'm not sure how to do that so I'd like to confirm. I don't use magit, but you should be ok on command line doing: $ git switch feature-branch-name $ git commit $ git push -u origin feature-branch-name where -u is a shortcut for --set-upstream as described by Stefan. > (By the way, I have come up with only a poor name > "feature/distinct-mode-name". Please tell me another name if you find > a better one.) I think we can live with that :-) Best, Arash
