Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > I have to re-read the thread, but wasn't a point also that latex-mode > and LaTeX-mode are also confusing to some users?
According to my (unreliable) memory :-), the thread began with a complaint that "I customized latex-mode-hook because the mode name is latex-mode, but that customization is ignored. Why?" So the similarity between latex-mode and LaTeX-mode doesn't relate directly in this particular case. > If so, can we think about coming up with mode names instead of > camel-case'ing the built-in ones? Maybe the similarity can be a source of future trouble. However, there is already a huge amount of codes with "LaTeX-" prefix in the current AUCTeX and I'm afraid that it isn't realistic to rewrite all of them. > I don't use magit, but you should be ok on command line doing: > $ git switch feature-branch-name > $ git commit > $ git push -u origin feature-branch-name > where -u is a shortcut for --set-upstream as described by Stefan. Thanks, as you can see, it worked well. >> (By the way, I have come up with only a poor name >> "feature/distinct-mode-name". Please tell me another name if you find >> a better one.) > I think we can live with that :-) I incorporated Stefan's idea. Thanks, Stefan. Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
