Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
>>>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: >> I have to re-read the thread, but wasn't a point also that latex-mode >> and LaTeX-mode are also confusing to some users? > > According to my (unreliable) memory :-), ;-) > the thread began with a complaint that "I customized latex-mode-hook > because the mode name is latex-mode, but that customization is > ignored. Why?" So the similarity between latex-mode and LaTeX-mode > doesn't relate directly in this particular case. Yes, it was about "Unfriendly take-over of AUCTeX once installed", but I think somewhere in the discussion, there was also sort of "latex-mode-hook vs. LaTeX-mode-hook is confusing". At any rate, we should also have a look at this issue while we're at it. >> If so, can we think about coming up with mode names instead of >> camel-case'ing the built-in ones? > > Maybe the similarity can be a source of future trouble. However, there > is already a huge amount of codes with "LaTeX-" prefix in the current > AUCTeX and I'm afraid that it isn't realistic to rewrite all of them. I was thinking about the mode names only; and not the namespace for functions/variables and the file names. Suppose the major mode is called AUCLaTeX-mode, then we have `AUCLaTeX-mode-hook' and we then define an alias `LaTeX-mode-hook' for a certain period of time. Does this make sense? > Thanks, as you can see, it worked well. 👍 Best, Arash
