Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:14, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> a écrit : > Hi Jean-François, > > 2016-01-24 10:38 GMT+01:00 jfbu <j...@free.fr>: >> Sorry for the delay. It was a very big file, with complicated >> non-typical structure (thousands of lines before \documentclass), >> and I should have focused on where "beamer" actually appeared in >> the file, but did not have the time back then. >> >> Your message seems to imply that the >> following is unexpected: >> >> % file testauctexparse.tex >> \documentclass{article} >> \begin{document} >> % insert thousands of lines if you wish >> \begin{verbatim} >> \documentclass{beamer} >> \end{verbatim} >> \end{document} >> >> Steps to reproduce: >> >> 1. create the above file with extension .tex. >> >> 2. Try C-cC-e and the default environment is "frame" >> >> 3. Try an itemize environment and an Overlay spec will be ask for. >> >> 4. The following testauctexparse.el file appears in auto/: >> (possibly after an extra C-xC-s) >> >> (TeX-add-style-hook >> "testauctexparse" >> (lambda () >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-environments-local "semiverbatim") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperref") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperimage") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperbaseurl") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "nolinkurl") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "url") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "path") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local "url") >> (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local "path") >> (TeX-run-style-hooks >> "latex2e" >> "article" >> "art10" >> "beamer" >> "beamer10"))) > > I was almost sure that code in verbatim environment was ignored during > parsing, but I was completely wrong. Reading the code, there is no > such test and I think it's so for performance reasons. The obvious > fix would be to do said test, but I fear parsing time would increase > sensibly. I should do some tests. > > For your specific problem, you can redefine > `TeX-arg-beamer-overlay-spec' function to do nothing, at least while > you work on that document. > > Bye, > Mosè
Hi Mosè I stopped working on the document some days ago, which is why I could make the report here finally ;-) Thanks for the tip. Could the parsing possibly decide not to take into account a second `\documentclass` ? Bye, Jean-François _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex