Le 24 janv. 2016 à 16:12, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> a écrit : > 2016-01-24 16:05 GMT+01:00 jfbu <j...@free.fr>: >> >> Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:54, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> a écrit : >> >>> 2016-01-24 15:49 GMT+01:00 jfbu <j...@free.fr>: >>>> how do you time the parsing ? >>> >>> With `benchmark-run'. In the file buffer run >>> >>> M-: (benchmark-run (TeX-auto-parse)) RET >>> >>> The first argument of `benchmark-run' can be the number of the >>> repetitions of the form. >>> >> >> >> I got this before the patch >> >> (0.087632 1 0.029196999999999917) >> >> and after the patch: >> >> (3.623112 30 0.7104439999999999) >> >> in the mean time I patched tex.el, byte-compiled and loaded it. >> >> Thus it seems I have indeed a rather drastic time increase >> with my big document. >> >> I also tried C-cC-n and had indeed about three seconds wait. >> >> The .el file has no beamer anymore. >> >> But obviously, I am tempted to conclude that >> time penalty is too big. > > `LaTeX-verbatim-p' looks first at the face at point, then to the > current macro, and if all previous tests are nil, which is the most > common case, runs also `LaTeX-current-environment', which is known to > be *slow*. > > I think current parsing time is acceptable, less than 0.1 s in your > long and complex document is reasonably low, and I hoped that there > were already the test for verbatim mode. But since this test is not > there, adding it wouldn't be a fair trade-off. >
current parsing time is barely noticeable; with the patch applied however each time I change a single character and do C-xC-s I have to wait a few seconds for it to complete (on my big test document). Cheers Jean-François _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
