| From Vaughan Johnson <[email protected]> | Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:57:26 -0700 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] [Audacity-devel] 2.0.1? > Okay, I'm going to be Release Manager for 2.0.1. I'd like to get it out > by end of June, but I need a summary of where we are, before deciding that. > > I think we do not really need a full two-week freeze, per > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process item 1. Per > item 7, I think it's more important to set the freeze date, and go > through the 48-hour cycle iterations to get to release date. > > Please let me know who can do what tasks specified in > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process item 3.
I can do: 3.4 "Someone to do 1 Release notes 2 Web site 3 Web site checking using http://validator.w3.org/checklink or similar, and reporting errors/warnings 4 Wiki changes 5 A test on the local manual using http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/ or similar, and reporting errors/warnings" This assumes we are not planning major web site changes that might challenge me or take me too long to research. I can live with a reasonably short news announcement. I assume you'll get takers to build the Win exe (installer) and zip so I won't offer to do that (unless essential). > Please make sure that bug priorities are as desired for release. I will skim the P3's over the weekend (if not before) for any that I feel must go to P2. I'm not guaranteeing I will have time to demote any but probably some could and should be demoted. > Also, I've seen posts about new features and their relative > desirabilities. Do we have a place tracking those, other than this > thread? Any outside this thread? I think my other posts in this thread covers most of that. "New features" would be in Wiki Proposals: http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Category:Proposal or in some cases in bugzilla enhancements if I or someone felt special merit in them and/or had a patch: http://tinyurl.com/cnflpew . I tested Benjamin's patch for "Point labels should be retainable or removable when deleting a selection abutting a label" a while ago: http://bugzilla.audacityteam.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466 . I still prefer a solution of retaining the label if Sync-Lock is on but the label track not selected (because this is more easily toggled than a preference) but I think this patch would be OK if consensus is for a preference (labels not retained by default). I have not compiled the patch recently. I did wonder if the description wording could be made more meaningful. I'll post there if I have anything else to say. Gale ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Audacity-translation mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-translation
