Re: Suggestion Regarding the Forum and Problematic Posts
A key thing everyone seems to have not considered is what metric determines whether or not a topic is toxic. I mean, you can say yes, Jaidon, that's going to be obvious, however what about the topics which were created with the intent of shit stirring but later evolved to be constructive? You can say the recent topic created by GrannyCheese can be considered toxic to some, but if then we decide to move this over to the proposed room, what about the discussion between Zarvox, Camlorn and Mechaskyguardian? Are we going to lose those posts just because the topic was deemed to be toxic? Yes, at times the forum can be negative, however most of the time there is something constructive and solid tossed in which then sparks sub discussion which will be of value to someone reading the thread. Or, what if a large minority of the forum says they don't deem grannycheese's topic toxic? What then happens? Even more, "Toxic", topics crops up which then forces the staff to be more proactive. But again, back to my point: What factors determines if a topic is toxic? If someone asks about clones is that toxic? If someone makes a topic in simular fashion to Nocturnous', would that be toxic? To me it looks good on the surface, but is like a dirty bandage. Looks like it fixes a problem, but underneath creates other issues.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
