P Floding;131818 Wrote: > > I have noticed that the ABX-brigade often see negative results as proof > of something, wheras it isn't in a scientific sense. >
I assure you (as a full-time scientist) that what you term a "negative" result goes precisely as far towards proving something as does a "positive" result. The statement "you can't prove a negative" is a common fallacy; to anyone with a passing knowledge of formal logic it's plainly not true. Since I doubt you will believe me and I don't want to argue about this again, please read any of these: http://www.google.com/search?q=you+can%27t+prove+a+negative -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26436 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
