AndrueC;134406 Wrote: > Oh rubbish. WMA is a perfectly satisfactory format for ripping audio. > It's widely accepted amongst players and although you can argue over > the quality of its compression most people seem to think it's slightly > better than MP3.
You're kidding right? I can often tell a typical WMA compressed song inside of five seconds, at least if it's at ~128kbps or below. Who are these people that think it's better? Have they tried lame? I cringe when I hear WMA. -- eq72521 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eq72521's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1512 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27004 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
