Are you the other Korean Kim that loves his TACT gear? I haven't tried that. I should take the time to try that with the Esoteric P-03 as well, as I can output that signal at multiples of 48 or 44.1.
krochat;150789 Wrote: > I and other Tact owners think the sample rate converter in the TacT > equipment has audible problems with non-integral conversions. > > The TacT gear works internally at 96kHz, so feeding it 48kHz, 96kHz, or > 192kHz sounds better than feeding it 44.1kHz. > > Have you tried using Adobe Audition (30-day free trial if you don't > have it already) and using it to upsample a CD track to say 96kHz/24 > bit (the maximum the Transporter will handle) and then comparing that > track played through the Transporter with playback through the North > Star? > > I have used Audition to upsample all my 44.1kHz files to 48kHz for > playback through the SB3 to my RCS 2.2X. Granted, it's not as > convenient to upsample with Audition as it is in the North Star, but it > only needs to be done once. > > Regards, > Kim -- Sleestack *headphone:* singlepower sds-xlr at, classe sacd2, hd650 *2 channel:* tact rcs 2.2.xp w/ full aberdeen mods, bel canto oneref. 1000 monoblocks x 4,teac esoteric p-03/d-03, epiphany 12-12s (waiting for my 20-21s), tact w210 corner load subs *5.1 channel:* tact tcs mkii w/ aberdeen power supply, tact boz 216/2200 (x5) w/ aberdeen power supply, tact adc6 w/ full aberdeen mods, denon 5910, bel canto pl-1a, eggleston andra ii (x5), velodyne dd-15, pioneer elite pro 1130hd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sleestack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6598 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28307 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
