Why Highdudgeon?

Really,  because I love opera and it is a wonderfully archaic word. 
Think of Wotan skulking across the sage, dragging a spear, wearing a
hat with pointy horns, and actually trying to be serious and indignant.
Anyway, it is a word I like.

My name is George.  As a disclaimer, I am very pround to be a Slim
Devices retailer.   

My immediate plans, in fact, are to carry this business to Europe and
to help place SD products with high-end dealers in central and southern
Europe.  I am moving to Italy (the Venetto) with my family, where my
wife will practice medicine at a hospital in Vicenza, some 45 miles
from Venice.  We have already been there this fall on a house-hunting
mission and I had a wonderful time demonstrating the Transporter on a
system that included Sonus Faber Stradivarius speakers.  Awesome.

I am in my early forties.  My educational background is in history and
physics, at the graduate level, but fortune (in the sense of accident)
led my to the IT industry in my lates 20s.  This allowed me to upgrade
my first "serious" system -- on a college student's budget -- which
consisted of a Thorens 'table, NAD integrated amp, Nakamichi tape deck
(remember those?), and B&W bookshelf speakers.  The next move up was to
an ARC D-100 amp, ARC SP9 Mk II preamp (marvelous device), I suddenly
can't remember the CD player, and Canton speakers.  

I've been interested in audio from an early age, being an avid music
collector, musician, and lover of live music.  I had been exposed to
some excellent systems in my youth.  My bought my first system with
savings from a summer job after my freshman year in college. From
there, it was a slippery slope. 

Tubes (Quad, ARC, McIntosh, Cary), solid state (Plinius, NAD, ARC,
McIntosh, Bel Canto -- twice -- Nuforce, Bryston, Carver, and probably
a few others); electrostatics, floorstanders, monitors; CD players,
universal players, SB3, Transporter.  Expensive cables (Acoustic Zen
Satoris, Oval 9's,s etc.) and inexpensive cables (Blue Jeans Cables
now, and Apogee Wyde Eyed for digital...I guess that's not so cheap). 
EQ devices (Rane, Behringer, Z-Systems). Various DACs.

Probably the most expensive system I have had in my house was the
following: Harbeth Monitor 40s (incidentally, among the handful of very
best amps I have ever heard, at any price), McIntosh MC-501s (a vanity
purchase; I traded down); Squeeze Box 3 and Lavry DA10.

Because of our move, large speakers are not an option -- my new room is
too small.  I have "downgraded" to Harbeth Monitor 30s, backed up by the
same ACI Force subs.  The subs are in the corders and the speakers are
set up per Allison rules.  I am running a Transporter directly into a
paid of Bel Canto Ref 1000.  The Bel Cantos replaced the Nuforces...I
just had too many issues with that company and have had problems with
the things.  The BC's are probably 99% as good as any amp needs to be. 
They're up there with the MC-402.  The MC-402 sounds exactly like the
MC-501s.  Stereophile compared the MC-501s to $30K+ Halcros as being
pretty much the same.  Why a switching amp?  Because they are small and
runn on US and European voltage.  Ditto for the Transporter!  Plug for
Audio Concepts: they will retrofit the amps on my subs for 220/240 for
free.   

Anyway,  this is hardly the best system on the planet and, thanks to
the very wonderful but admittedly small monitors, it lacks the body of
a system with true full-range speakers (of comparable quality, of
course).

Audio philosophy:

My rule of thumb is to spend more money on tickets to live music and on
CDs than I do home audio.  To begin with, I have two small children and,
quite honestly, my listening time at home is limited (somehow, they have
yet to damage anything...that amazes me every day).  

Having gone through as much equipment as I have, knowing as my
audiophiles as I do, and having a background in the sciences (I was
even managing editor of a psychology journal whilst in grad
school...managing as in I did all the dirty work for the academic
editor) leads me to believe in the value of double-blind testing.  You
need to work with one or more friends or family members to do this, of
course.  Ideally, you should have a few listeners, too, but that is not
necessary.  I don't do this all the time, of course, but it is fun to
do. Educational, too.  On the other hand, I am very much a
subjectivist, too.  This is about enjoyment, right?  I really dig and
believe in fine solid state amps for their accuracy.  However, I have a
pair of McIntosh MC-275s.  They are NOT on the same level of accuracy as
an SS amp and you can immediately hear this.  They are wonderfully warm
and rich, though, and I love them for that.  My reasons are purely
emotional.

Above all, my philosophy is simply to have fun, enjoy the hobby, and
remember that it is all about enjoying music.  That is why I enjoy the
Sb3 and Transporter so much and why I believe in Slim Devices.  Their
products heighten my ability to enjoy music in a way that suits my
technical interests and basic desires: it is flexible, open-source (I'm
waiting for Inguz for Mac!), and allows unlimited access to my music
collection while reproducing it with uncompromised quality.  I just
think these guys are smart as hell and on the bleeding edge.  This is
not marketing hype; this is how I feel.


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30141

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to