opaqueice;190389 Wrote: > Please. I don't care nearly enough about this to be considered a > fanboy, and I don't own a Transporter. > > It just seems a little odd to spend so much modifying a SB for improved > sound quality when the company that designed it in the first place has > produced a carefully engineered version with precisely that goal in > mind. While I don't doubt that Patrick Dixon knows what he's doing, > he's competing against a team of pros that have quite a few advantages > - a research budget, a nice lab stocked with fancy equipment, > engineering degrees, and the experience of years spent designing three > generations of SBs from the ground up. Not to mention a customer > service department. > > As for aesthetics, that's a perfectly valid reason, but obviously a > matter of taste - personally I don't much like the way either of them > looks.
Let's not forget that the sb+ has been around since before the transporter existed (afaik). -- davidcotton ------------------------------------------------------------------------ davidcotton's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4588 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33917 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
