chill;194599 Wrote: 
> Skunk
> 
> Ahem - worthy credentials indeed.
> 
> I'm probably more guilty of sarcasm than most, for which I apologise
> because sometimes the sarcasm isn't clear and confuses the point.

I'm confused as to whether 'ahem' clears the sarcasm from the air, or
highlights it...


>   Case in point: are you suggesting that the digital jack replacement is
> seriously the cause of the improvement, or are you being sarcastic as
> well? 

Yes, and no sarcasm intended. Whether it will be audible I don't know,
but how can a true 75 ohm interface *not* be an improvement over
something with unknown impedance? This is not like buying a $300
digital cable with RCA connectors. 'No-brainer' was a pretty good
choice of words by Jonte0, IMO.

I have a wired Sb, so don't worry about wireless issues. As for my
opinion, I trust Sean on this one. Why would he send a wireless Sb out
for review to Stereophile, or one with a switching PS for that matter,
if he didn't believe the performance wasn't hindered by their use? That
said, I'd probably disconnect the card if mine had one, because I've
never had a dropout (using Inguz EQ) and have grown used to the wire
coming out of hole in the floor.


-- 
Skunk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34406

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to