tomjtx;267439 Wrote: > You could have gotten the same result feeding transporter through a tube > preamp or buffer. > > I love tubes also but it is a shame you wasted that money when you > could have gotten the same results for a fraction of the price. > > It is getting a bit tiresome listening to talk about the illusory > "improvements" modded TP's make posted ,IMO, rudely. on the slim > forums. > Modwright has it's own forum for that.
Couldnt agree more. but out of curiosity, I would like to know what equipment is HalleysComet using with the transporter. I use my transporter with an integrated tube linestage and the sound is sooo musical, even without the tube linestage the transporter was never digitally bright or edgy, it was always very lively and warm tonality. So yes, this modded stuff just doesnt make sense to me, im sure you can do much better by buying a pair of good balanced interconnects. -- GuyDebord Reference3A RoyalMaster monitors biwired with van den Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5. AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon & Lyra Helikon SL, ASR MiniBasis SQ preamp, link: WireWorld SilverEclipse 5.2. DIGITAL: SlimDevices Transporter, link: AcousticZen Silver Reference2 XLRs. POWER: Isotek MiniSub GII, Isotek Elite cables (MiniSub, Rel), Siltech SPX30 MKII (Transporter), van den Hul Mainstream (Pathos) & van den Hul Mainserver (ASR). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43269
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
