DCtoDaylight;332578 Wrote: > So what we really need then is a way to quantify the jitter type, rather > than the overly simplistic RMS Jitter value usually quoted in spec > sheets. Another case of the graphical representation giving you a lot > more information than a simple number. As long as you understand how > to interpret the graph of course! >
Occasionally you'll see plots of jitter spectra, but yeah, it's not very common. And actually the most common measurement I've seen is peak-peak rather than RMS. As far as I can see peak-peak is a very bad measure - it's not well-defined mathematically (it has no limit for large amounts of data) and it's non-robust (i.e. very sensitive to minor data anomalies). -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50147 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
