snarlydwarf;530004 Wrote: > The catch is those graphs are not comparing "digital to analog" ... > there is no analog source depicted for comparison: you are left to fill > out the ideal curves in your head. Believing those ideal curves are > representative of how an analog source would display, however, is an > error. > > All they show is that digital is an approximation and at enough of a > 'zoom level' you can see the edges of the line. > > So what? Zoom in that close on a real world analog signal (which > medium? Vinyl isn't the only analog medium) and you will see > distortion. > > It's not even a question of "is it audible", it's a question of > implying that analog sources somehow make a magical sine wave with no > distortiona at all, which is plain and simply not true.
I was not talking about graphs, that was my pure listening experience. In ideal world, I would simply have turntable for older recordings (like Miles Davis, Coltrane, etc.) -- michael123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76496 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
