michael123;529986 Wrote: > Thanks, wireless200. > > mlsstl, > > Then why is the need to work with 192KHz at all? Why the industry > adopts DXD, which is 384Hz, I think..? I saw few labels going this way, > and there is hardware available of course.. > > > There is one interesting article, comparing analog and different > digital techniques: > http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/technical-articles/427-a-secrets-technical-article.html > > Even with 192/24, analog still has an edge over digital recording > (see here, for example - > http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/technical-articles/427-a-secrets-technical-article.html?start=3) > > I think the main idea of high-resolution is to provide a proper > substitute to vinyl and/or master tape. > > HDAD by Classic Records indeed sounds very close, still older records > sound much better on turntable than on computer. > > Recent (USB) release of Beatles was 44.1/24, but, as I understood, it > was digitized on much higher sample rate, and will be re-released in > the future.
Problem is nobody cares. You'll have a few esoteric recordings from boutique studios that will sell six copies to "audiophiles" but the popular mainstream lables will continue to ship junk product. -- ghostrider ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ghostrider's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18959 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76496 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
