magiccarpetride;585646 Wrote: > OK, I did that, and if I now tell people that I still hear the > differences, I'd be flatly accused of suffering from the expectation > bias. You, on the other hand, are for some weird reason exempt from > such accusations. You claim that you can't hear the differences, and lo > and behold, everyone seems to take your word as a Gospel. My question to > you now: what did your parents feed you when you were a child so that > you grew up as a person who is immune to the expectation bias? > > Childish, isn't it?
magiccarpetride: Did you do an ABX of the two samples. How many trials and what were the results. Foobar2000 has a nice utility for doing ABX trials. One can easily avoid the expectation bias issue with a ABX test and enough trials. If you tell me that you could pick one version over the other, say 70-80% of the time (in a blind ABX test) over, say, 10 trials, I certainly wouldn't argue that your results are expectation bias. -- garym ------------------------------------------------------------------------ garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82870 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
