soundcheck;623349 Wrote: > John. Very interesting. Great to see that you measured some kind of > impact. > > "Less processing for smaller buffers"!?!? Hmmh. > > You got a lot more interrupts in the system to refill a smaller > buffer. > Theoretically the total amount of data you process should be the same, > if you take a certain buffer management losses out of equation. > > > Perhaps this is something of interest, it might be related to the > subject: > > An article about buffer or latency jitter can be found over 'here' > (http://www.rme-audio.de/english/techinfo/lola_latec.htm) at RME. > > > Cheers
That's a totally different concept - RME are talking about latency - the delay between an input stimulus (such as an incoming midi note-on event from a keyboard or other controller) and the generation of the desired corresponding sound from a software or hardware sampler or sound generator/synth. The "jitter" they describe is variability in THIS latency - and anyone who's spent time in a midi-equipped studio will be familiar with this - it's very annoying. Anyway, maybe JS could clarify what he saw/measured? -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Belden Digital,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
