Having just read 'the post(s) that seem to have inspired this thread' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=625617), let's fix that statement to reflect the alternate point of view:
> It would appear that in order to pass the rite of passage and be > decorated with the "you're now one of us, one of the in-crowd" gold > medal on this (and on many other audiophile forums), one need to put on > the most cynical, skeptical face and ridicule and deride anyone who > *does not claim* to be able to hear any differences *due to specific > modifications*. > > Still, many people *cannot* hear differences in the sound quality *due > to those modifications*. My question: if you *cannot* hear a > *spectacular* difference, does it, according to the First Audiophile > Asshole Law, always mean that something about that *person's hearing* > is broken? > > ... > > How can people afford to always act in such an asshole-ish knee-jerk > manner all the time? > -- snottmonster ------------------------------------------------------------------------ snottmonster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=45063 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87051 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
