ralphpnj;690047 Wrote: > Oncology is the study of cancer which makes Dr. Zeilig about as > qualified to write about computer based digital audio as my > endocrinologist. While I don't ask that everyone who writes about audio > have a background in audio what I do expect is that when they write > something that so directly contradicts all known scientific knowledge > and evidence that they at least back it up with some real proof. Making > fancy tables of and assigning numbers to what are basically just sighted > listening tests does not make "I heard a difference" into real proof. > > As an aside I just want to say that I'm not against good sounding audio > equipment, even the high priced stuff, and judging by some of the > signatures on this forum, so are many other members. What I'm against > is use of pseudoscience as a means of justifying some of their > misguided beliefs.
Ok, I shouldn't have said I had _no_ idea what his degree entailed. :) I know roughly what oncology is. But have no idea what math or relevant science he might know. I agree with you completely. -- totoro sb3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 + rel storm 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
