Mnyb wrote: > in fact all the reasoning you cited (cant find that post ) is clearly > the usual spiel from someone who actually don't understand the sample > theorem and is influnced by audiophile beliefs .
Yes - the next thing he will be claiming is that you get a "clearer" and "shinier" sound by using USB cables with silver instead of copper wires. A lot of old-school audiophiles don't understand digital technology, but still apply their analog-age beliefs to digital. > The usual audiophile myths is that time resolving is limited to 1/44.1 > for CD this is not true ,just look at the reconstructed analogue signal > it looks continues to me and will be identical to to the original > -bandwidth limited- signal. I still hurt from the bad beating I got on Computer Audiophool when I tried to explain that, even using waveform plots... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69882 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
