Eric Seaberg wrote: > Very few studios are tracking at 96k let alone 192k! The amount of > required storage space is HUGE. Some of the best engineers in the > business have said 96k isn't worth it, but the jump to 192k is getting > close. > > STILL, no one is going to buy it. Look at how the DVD-A and SACD have > survived? Heck, the DAT was supposed to kill the cassette back in '86! > You're trying to sell GREAT sounding stuff to a consumer that's more > than happy with a 128kbps MP3. Maybe higher quality audio on Blu-Ray > will get some things going again.
And after 3 years, this sounds just as funny as "640K ought to be enough for anybody." :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69882 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
